tablesaw: -- (Default)
Tablesaw Tablesawsen ([personal profile] tablesaw) wrote2003-08-02 02:06 am

Tablesaw for Governor:

If you're still on the fence about whether the recall is a good idea, you may want to read this article from Friday's LA Times: It Could Be a Long, Quirky Ballot. Registration and cookies are, unfortunately, required, so for those who eschew either, here's a quick summary:

The requirement for nomination to a statewide office during a regular election in California are sixty-five to one hundred signatures of members of the same party (Cal Elec. Code Sec. 8062) and a fee of two percent of the first-year salary of the office sought (Cal. Elec. Code Sec. 8103). There's some confusion about how this applies to this election, though. See, prefacing those and other sections regarding the nomination of candidates is a statement saying, "This chapter does not apply to recall elections." Cal. Elec. Code. Sec. 8000(a). Unfortunately, nobody thought to write down in the laws what procedures do apply to recall elections. Hopefuls have little more than a week to get their candidacies registered, and it doesn't look like the legislature's going to be able to think tem up any time soon (they're still exhausted from staying up all night to pass an ineffectual budget), so it seems that those standards are here to stay.

So, all you need to get onto the ballot on October 7 is $3500 and sixty-five friends. Actually, this is true of any race for governor except that, normally, there's a primary election that whittles any fringe candidates away. This time, there's nothing standing between any citizen and the ballot save the aforementioned criteria. And who's planning a run for the Governor's Mansion?I'll admit that, were the fee not so high, I'd be on the ballot too. Anyone interested in funding a campaign?

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting